Environmental

Publicly available filings provide limited disclosure on emissions, energy use, and waste, leaving ZOOZ broadly comparable to smaller peers but below better-disclosed issuers.

The absence of reported R&D intensity and operating footprint metrics suggests a light direct environmental burden, yet peer benchmarking remains constrained by sparse sustainability data.

Low leverage can reduce financing pressure for capital-intensive environmental upgrades, but it does not itself indicate stronger environmental management versus peers.

No Tier 1 evidence indicates material environmental controversies, so ZOOZ appears neither advantaged nor disadvantaged on disclosed environmental risk relative to peers.

Social

Available disclosures provide limited visibility into workforce composition, safety, and turnover, which weakens ZOOZ's relative social transparency versus better-reporting peers.

Zero reported stock-based compensation to revenue may indicate limited dilution pressure, but it does not materially evidence stronger employee alignment or retention practices.

Sparse disclosure on training, diversity, and labor practices makes it difficult to assess whether ZOOZ matches peers on human-capital management.

No Tier 1 sources identify major labor or product-safety controversies, so the social profile appears neutral rather than clearly stronger than peers.

Governance

Very low debt-to-equity suggests conservative balance-sheet governance, which can reduce creditor pressure and improve oversight relative to more leveraged peers.

Net debt to EBITDA remains modest, indicating manageable financial discipline, although it does not substitute for board, audit, or shareholder-rights disclosure.

Limited public ESG and governance detail constrains assessment of independence, executive accountability, and control quality versus better-governed peers.

No Tier 1 evidence of severe governance failures or controversies is available, so ZOOZ appears average rather than structurally weak on governance.

Overall Score

ZOOZ ranks as a moderate ESG peer relative because low leverage supports governance resilience, but sparse disclosure limits evidence of stronger environmental and social positioning.

Score Driver: Limited ESG Disclosure Across Environmental And Social Dimensions