SUN

Sunoco LP (SUN) SWOT Analysis Analysis (2026)

Invetso Score: 4.1/10 — Balanced · Last Updated: 2026-10-01

Strengths

ROIC of 6.8% indicates modest capital efficiency, but it remains below stronger peer operators that typically sustain higher returns through scale and pricing power.

A current ratio of 1.29 supports near-term liquidity, yet it is only adequate versus peers with stronger balance-sheet flexibility and larger cash buffers.

The company’s cash conversion cycle of 49.5 days suggests working-capital discipline, although it is not a clear structural advantage versus faster-turning peers.

Weaknesses

Net debt to EBITDA of 4.7x signals elevated leverage, leaving SUN more constrained than peers with lower refinancing risk and greater strategic flexibility.

Debt to equity of 1.78 indicates a heavier capital structure than many peers, which can suppress equity resilience when industry conditions weaken.

The quick ratio of 0.83 sits below 1.0, showing limited immediate liquidity and weaker short-term coverage than better-capitalized competitors.

A 49.5-day cash conversion cycle ties up cash longer than leaner peers, reducing financial agility and increasing dependence on external funding.

Opportunities

Improving working-capital efficiency could release cash from operations, and peers with longer cycles show that even incremental gains can materially strengthen flexibility.

If SUN can lift returns on invested capital, it could narrow the gap with higher-quality peers and improve its relative capital allocation profile.

A stronger liquidity profile would reduce reliance on debt markets, which would matter more for SUN than for peers with stronger balance sheets.

Threats

High leverage leaves SUN more exposed than peers to higher interest costs and tighter credit conditions, which can pressure margins and refinancing access.

Weak liquidity metrics increase the risk that operating volatility forces balance-sheet actions sooner than for better-capitalized competitors.

Lower capital efficiency versus stronger peers can limit reinvestment capacity, making it harder to defend positioning if industry demand softens.

A long cash conversion cycle can amplify working-capital strain during downturns, leaving SUN less resilient than peers with faster cash generation.

Overall Score

SUN’s structural positioning is constrained by leverage and liquidity weakness, while modest capital efficiency and working-capital discipline provide only limited offset versus peers.

Sources

  • Company filings (10-K, 10-Q, investor presentations)
  • Financial and market data providers
  • Public news and industry information

🔒 Go Beyond This Framework

This is one of 10 institutional-grade frameworks Invetso runs on Sunoco LP. Unlock the complete analysis — SWOT, Economic Moat, Porter’s Five Forces, Management, PESTLE and the Invetso Quality Score.

Create your free account on Invetso →