ST

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) ESG Analysis Analysis (2026)

Invetso Score: 6.8/10 — Balanced · Last Updated: 2026-08-01

Environmental

R&D intensity is modest at 3.4% of revenue, suggesting limited low-carbon or process-innovation spend versus peers with heavier technology investment.

Leverage is moderate with net debt to EBITDA at 2.8x, which can constrain funding flexibility for environmental upgrades relative to less levered peers.

Gross margin of 28.5% provides some internal capacity for efficiency initiatives, but it does not indicate a peer-leading environmental cost advantage.

No disclosed environmental metrics on emissions, energy, or water were provided, limiting evidence of a structurally stronger environmental profile versus peers.

Social

Stock-based compensation equals 0.9% of revenue, indicating restrained dilution and a comparatively disciplined approach to employee incentive costs versus peers.

The provided metrics do not show workforce, safety, or turnover indicators, so social positioning cannot be confirmed as stronger than peers.

Moderate leverage may indirectly pressure labor investment and training budgets, leaving social resilience less clearly advantaged than in stronger balance-sheet peers.

No customer, supply-chain, or community metrics were provided, preventing evidence of a peer-leading social franchise.

Governance

Stock-based compensation at 0.9% of revenue is low, supporting better alignment and capital discipline versus peers with heavier equity compensation loads.

Debt to equity of 0.83x indicates moderate balance-sheet risk, which is more conservative than highly levered peers and supports governance resilience.

Net debt to EBITDA of 2.8x is manageable, but it is not best-in-class, so governance strength is solid rather than exceptional.

The absence of disclosed controversy, board, or audit issues in the provided data prevents a stronger score, but no structural governance weakness is evident.

Overall Score

ST appears moderately positioned on ESG versus peers, with governance the clearest relative strength and limited disclosed environmental and social evidence capping the overall score.

Score Driver: Governance Discipline, Led By Low Stock-Based Compensation And Moderate Leverage, Is The Main Relative Advantage.

Sources

  • Company filings (10-K, 10-Q, investor presentations)
  • Financial and market data providers
  • Public news and industry information

🔒 Go Beyond This Framework

This is one of 10 institutional-grade frameworks Invetso runs on Sensata Technologies Holding plc. Unlock the complete analysis — SWOT, Economic Moat, Porter’s Five Forces, Management, PESTLE and the Invetso Quality Score.

Create your free account on Invetso →