Environmental

OMAB’s airport operations create ongoing energy, water, and waste-management exposure, but these impacts are typically less carbon-intensive than airlines or heavy industrial peers.

The company’s environmental profile is constrained by airport infrastructure needs, yet peer comparison is tempered because regional airport operators generally face similar utility and permitting burdens.

No disclosed R&D intensity suggests limited environmental innovation disclosure, which weakens transparency versus peers that publish more detailed decarbonization or resource-efficiency programs.

Absent post-August 2025 filings, the available evidence does not indicate a material environmental controversy, so OMAB appears broadly in line with comparable transport-infrastructure operators.

Social

Airport operators are highly exposed to passenger safety and service continuity, and OMAB’s operating model benefits from the sector’s inherently strong focus on operational discipline.

OMAB’s social risk is moderated by its infrastructure role, because service disruptions and security failures would quickly affect reputation more than in many non-public-facing peers.

The company’s labor and community footprint is meaningful, but airport peers typically face similar workforce, contractor, and local stakeholder expectations, limiting relative disadvantage.

No disclosed severe social controversy is evident in the provided information, supporting a stronger relative social position than peers with recurring labor or community disputes.

Governance

OMAB’s leverage metrics indicate moderate balance-sheet discipline, but they do not by themselves establish superior governance versus peers with stronger capital-allocation disclosure.

The absence of stock-based compensation in the provided metrics suggests limited dilution pressure, which is favorable relative to peers that rely more heavily on equity incentives.

Governance assessment is constrained by the lack of filing detail on board independence, audit oversight, and shareholder protections, leaving OMAB closer to peer norms than leaders.

Without evidence of major controversies or control failures, OMAB appears adequately governed, but not clearly differentiated from other listed airport operators.

Overall Score

OMAB’s ESG profile is broadly in line with airport peers, with social strengths offset by only moderate environmental and governance differentiation.

Score Driver: Relative Social Resilience And Absence Of Major Disclosed Controversies Are The Main Supports, While Limited ESG Disclosure Keeps The Overall Profile From Ranking Higher.