NSTS

NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) SWOT Analysis Analysis (2026)

Invetso Score: 1.7/10 — Weak · Last Updated: 2026-09-01

Monthly Update
Overall Score6
Change+6

Strengths

Score: 2.1 (Weak)

Cash conversion cycle of 23.2 days is modestly efficient, but without peer evidence it does not offset NSTS’s broader balance-sheet and profitability constraints.

Return on invested capital of 0.06% indicates minimal value creation, leaving NSTS structurally behind peers that can compound capital at materially higher rates.

Weaknesses

Score:

Net debt to EBITDA of 108.1x signals extreme leverage relative to peers, severely constraining financial flexibility and raising refinancing risk over the next 2–5 years.

Current and quick ratios of 0.49x show weak near-term liquidity, leaving NSTS less resilient than peers with stronger working-capital buffers.

Debt-to-equity of 0.36x is not excessive in isolation, but it is overshadowed by the very high leverage burden and does not materially improve positioning.

Missing margin disclosure limits precision, yet the available profitability and leverage metrics still indicate NSTS lacks the durable operating strength seen in stronger peers.

Opportunities

Score:

If NSTS improves capital efficiency from an extremely low ROIC base, even modest operating gains could narrow the gap versus peers with more established returns.

A shorter cash conversion cycle could free working capital and partially offset liquidity weakness, improving relative flexibility versus peers with slower conversion.

Because segment concentration data are unavailable, any diversification or mix shift could improve resilience if current exposure is narrower than peers.

Threats

Score:

Persistently high net debt to EBITDA leaves NSTS more exposed than peers to higher rates, covenant pressure, and refinancing risk if earnings remain weak.

Sub-1.0x liquidity ratios increase the chance that working-capital shocks force dilutive financing or operational pullbacks, unlike better-capitalized peers.

With ROIC near zero, NSTS risks falling further behind peers that can reinvest at higher returns and widen the structural performance gap.

Absent segment data, NSTS may still face concentration risk, but the larger immediate threat remains financial fragility rather than business mix.

Overall Score

Score:

NSTS appears structurally weak versus peers because extreme leverage and poor liquidity dominate, while capital efficiency remains too low to support durable competitive positioning.

Sources

  • Company filings (10-K, 10-Q, investor presentations)
  • Financial and market data providers
  • Public news and industry information

🔒 Go Beyond This Framework

This is one of 10 institutional-grade frameworks Invetso runs on NSTS Bancorp, Inc.. Unlock the complete analysis — SWOT, Economic Moat, Porter’s Five Forces, Management, PESTLE and the Invetso Quality Score.

Create your free account on Invetso →