INCR
InterCure Ltd. (INCR) SWOT Analysis Analysis (2026)
No material changes this month.
Strengths
Negative TTM ROIC indicates weaker capital efficiency than profitable peers, but the metric alone does not capture any offsetting structural advantage.
A current ratio of 1.48 suggests near-term liquidity is adequate versus distressed peers, although it remains below the cushion typically seen in stronger operators.
A quick ratio of 0.97 implies liquid assets roughly cover short-term liabilities, which is better than highly constrained peers but not a clear advantage.
The company’s cash conversion cycle of 272 days signals working-capital intensity, yet peers with similarly long cycles often face comparable inventory and receivables drag.
Weaknesses
TTM ROIC of -4.7% shows capital is not earning its cost, leaving INCR structurally behind peers that compound value through positive returns.
A cash conversion cycle of 272 days is very long versus most peers, tying up cash in operations and limiting flexibility for growth or shocks.
A quick ratio below 1.0 indicates limited immediate liquidity, making INCR less resilient than peers with stronger near-cash coverage.
Debt-to-equity of 0.46 and net debt to EBITDA of -2.47 suggest leverage is not extreme, but they do not offset the company’s weak operating efficiency.
Opportunities
If working capital is normalized, the unusually long cash conversion cycle could release cash faster than peers with already efficient cycles, improving liquidity and funding capacity.
A current ratio above 1.0 provides room to improve short-term balance-sheet resilience, which could narrow the gap versus more liquid peers.
Because leverage is not highly stretched, incremental operational improvement could translate into faster relative positioning gains than for more indebted peers.
Any move from negative to positive ROIC would materially improve peer standing, since the current base leaves substantial room for catch-up.
Threats
Peers with positive ROIC can reinvest at higher returns, widening the structural gap if INCR remains below breakeven.
A prolonged 272-day cash conversion cycle increases the risk of cash strain versus peers with shorter cycles, especially if demand softens.
Sub-1.0 quick ratio leaves less buffer than stronger peers, raising vulnerability to working-capital shocks or tighter credit conditions.
If operating efficiency does not improve, the company may continue to lag peers on margin quality and capital allocation effectiveness over the medium term.
Overall Score
INCR’s peer positioning is weak overall because negative ROIC and a very long cash conversion cycle outweigh only modest liquidity and leverage support.
Sources
- Company filings (10-K, 10-Q, investor presentations)
- Financial and market data providers
- Public news and industry information
🔒 Go Beyond This Framework
This is one of 10 institutional-grade frameworks Invetso runs on InterCure Ltd.. Unlock the complete analysis — SWOT, Economic Moat, Porter’s Five Forces, Management, PESTLE and the Invetso Quality Score.
