Environmental

GDEV’s environmental profile appears neutral versus peers because the business is digital and asset-light, limiting direct emissions and resource intensity relative to physical operators.

The provided metrics show no R&D or capital-intensity signal, which reduces visibility on environmental process discipline compared with peers that disclose energy or waste controls.

Absence of disclosed environmental metrics in the supplied data weakens comparability, leaving GDEV neither advantaged nor clearly disadvantaged versus peers with fuller reporting.

Any environmental risk is likely indirect through outsourced infrastructure and data-center usage, which is typically less material than for hardware or manufacturing peers.

Social

GDEV’s low stock-based compensation to revenue suggests restrained dilution pressure, which can support employee alignment relative to peers with heavier equity-based pay.

As a digital entertainment company, social exposure is more tied to user welfare, content governance, and responsible engagement than to physical workplace or supply-chain risks.

The lack of disclosed workforce, safety, or community metrics limits evidence of stronger social practices, keeping the profile broadly in line with mid-tier peers.

Compared with larger consumer-platform peers, GDEV likely faces lower absolute labor and community footprint, but also less disclosure on human-capital management.

Governance

GDEV’s negative debt-to-equity and net-debt-to-EBITDA metrics indicate a conservative balance-sheet posture, which generally reduces creditor pressure and governance strain versus leveraged peers.

Very low stock-based compensation to revenue points to tighter capital discipline, which can align management incentives more closely than peers with heavier equity issuance.

The absence of filing-based board, audit, and ownership details in the supplied data limits confidence in governance strength, preventing a higher relative score.

Overall governance appears acceptable rather than leading, because the available metrics suggest discipline but not enough transparency to distinguish GDEV from best-in-class peers.

Overall Score

GDEV’s ESG positioning is broadly average to slightly better than peers, with the clearest relative support coming from conservative capital discipline and limited direct environmental exposure.

Score Driver: Conservative Leverage And Low Compensation Dilution Versus Peers